AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance Framework for Smart Engineering Systems Using Multivariate Sensor Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31181/sa202585Keywords:
Predictive maintenance, multivariate sensor data, deep learning, smart engineering systems, Industry 4.0.Abstract
This study presents an AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance (AI-PdM) framework that fuses multivariate sensor streams (vibration, temperature, pressure, current draw, and lubricant condition) with deep learning-based prognostic models to forecast impending failures and estimate Remaining Useful Life (RUL). The study integrates data preprocessing, statistical and spectral feature engineering, SHAP-based feature selection, and an ensemble of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Transformer, and one-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1D-CNN) architectures benchmarked against Random Forest and Support Vector Machine baselines. The framework was evaluated on the NASA C-MAPSS turbofan degradation dataset, the PHM 2012 bearing dataset, the SECOM semiconductor manufacturing dataset, and real vibration-temperature-pressure sensor logs collected from three engineering assets: a CNC machining center, an HVAC chiller unit, and a wind turbine gearbox. Experimental results show that the AI-PdM framework achieves a failure-prediction accuracy exceeding 95% (92-98% range across models and horizons), with an average early-warning lead time of approximately 60 hours (range 48-168 hours) ahead of actual failure events. RUL estimation attained a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 10-15 cycles and a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 12-20 cycles. The framework maintained a false-positive rate at or below 3%, cutting false alarms by roughly 60% relative to conventional threshold-based monitoring, and remained robust to sensor degradation, with accuracy declining by less than 5% under 20% missing data or 10% injected noise. Deployment simulations across the three case-study assets demonstrate that the framework generalizes with greater than 90% accuracy, reduces unplanned downtime by approximately 60% (range 50-70%), and lowers overall maintenance cost by approximately 35% (range 25-40%) relative to reactive and preventive strategies.
References
Rozhok, A., Abate, R., Manoli, E., & Nele, L. (2025). A review of recent advanced applications in smart manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10010001
Hamza, M. F. (2026). Cloud, edge, and digital twin architectures for condition monitoring of computer numerical control machine tools: A systematic review. Information, 17(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/info17020153
Jadhav, P. S., Gaji, R., Shete, H., & Gavali, P. (2026). Sustainable and intelligent machining of advanced materials: Emerging trends and future directions. Mechanical Theory and Systems, 2(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.64229/kq7yb177
Bhuyan, B. P., Saadi, A. A., Meraihi, Y., & Ramdane Cherif, A. (2026). Applications in engineering and technology. In Scientific Machine Learning: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications (pp. 679–783). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-7856-6_12%0A%0A
Zhu, T., Ran, Y., Zhou, X., & Wen, Y. (2025). A survey on intelligent predictive maintenance (IPdM) in the era of fully connected intelligence. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 28, 633–671. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2025.3567802
Garcia, J., Rios Colque, L., Peña, A., & Rojas, L. (2025). Condition monitoring and predictive maintenance in industrial equipment: An nlp-assisted review of signal processing, hybrid models, and implementation challenges. Applied Sciences, 15(10), 5465. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105465
Vashishtha, G., Chauhan, S., Sehri, M., Hebda Sobkowicz, J., Zimroz, R., Dumond, P., & Kumar, R. (2025). Advancing machine fault diagnosis: A detailed examination of convolutional neural networks. Measurement Science and Technology, 36(2), 22001. DOI 10.1088/1361-6501/ada178%0A%0A
Irfan, M., Ahmed Khan, N., Mushtaq, Z., Abbas, G., Shaher, A., & Rahman, S. (2026). A convolutional state-space framework for wind turbine fault diagnosis using hierarchical feature extraction and dynamic state modeling on SCADA system. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, 41(3), 1582–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2025.2502148
Kishnani, H., Wang, X. A., Muhammad, S., Yi, S. H., Khurram, M., Jimenez Garnica, G., & Kumar, S. (2026). Predictive maintenance for additive manufacturing through integrated lean six sigma and artificial intelligence approaches. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-026-18427-5%0A%0A
Abdelfadeel, S. I., HossamEldin, S., Yaser, A. A., Al, A. H. M. A. Q., & Alnahdi, M. M. (2025). Maintenance 4.0 for HVAC systems: Addressing implementation challenges and research gaps. Smart Cities, 8(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8020066
Wang, R. (2026). A data-driven predictive maintenance framework for smart buildings: Integrating digital twin and machine learning in HVAC systems. Journal of Building Engineering, 115416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2026.115416
El Thalji, I., Usman, A., & Ali, W. (2026). Evaluating RUL predictive models: A risk-based predictive maintenance approach. AI, 7(5), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7050169
Babaei Pouya, A., Mortazavi, S. B., & Ahmadi, O. (2025). Optimizing emergency shutdown system inspection, testing, and maintenance through the tool design and validation. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 36855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20964-0%0A%0A
Patil, M. S., & Malwatkar, G. M. (2024). A compressive study on fault detection and diagnosis for reliable operation of HVAC, energy buildings and machineries. Reliability: Theory & Applications, 19(1 (77)), 631–649. https://gnedenko.net/Journal/2024/012024/RTA_1_2024-49.pdf
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Systemic Analytics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the